Confluent
Streams and Tables: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Stream Processing

Streams and Tables: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Matthias J. SaxGuozhang Wang

We are happy to announce that our paper Streams and Tables: Two Sides of the Same Coin is published and available for free download. The paper was presented at the Twelfth International Workshop on Real-Time Business Intelligence and Analytics (BIRTE) held in conjunction with the 44th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in August of this year.

The BIRTE workshop attracted many participants and hosted a keynote, research, industry and demo session as well as a panel discussion about data stream processing.

Paper summary

The paper is a joint work between Confluent and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin that describes the Dual Streaming Model, which is the foundation of Kafka Streams’ and KSQL’s stream processing semantics:

In this paper, we introduce the Dual Streaming Model to reason about physical and logical order in data stream processing. This model presents the result of an operator as a stream of successive updates, which induces a duality of results and streams. As such, it provides a natural way to cope with inconsistencies between the physical and logical order of streaming data in a continuous manner, without explicit buffering and reordering. We further discuss the trade-offs and challenges faced when implementing this model in terms of correctness, latency, and processing cost. A case study based on Apache Kafka illustrates the effectiveness of our model in the light of real-world requirements.
Original Source

The Dual Streaming Model builds on the so-called stream-table duality, which allows you to unify data streams and relational tables into a holistic data processing model. Thus, data streams and continuously updating tables are the two core abstractions in the model. Additionally, the Dual Streaming Model decouples the handling of data that arrives later (i.e., out-of-order) from latency concerns and opens up a design space between processing cost, accepted latency and result completeness for the user that no other model offers.

Figure 1. Design Space

Figure 1. Design space

The wide adoption and growth of Kafka Streams and KSQL among enterprises shows that the Dual Streaming Model solves real-world problems across all types of industries. As a result, we are elated to share our paper for free so you can become the stream processing expert in your company and take the business to the next level.

Happy reading! 🙂

Next steps

Subscribe to the Confluent Blog

Subscribe

More Articles Like This

Suppress Feature
John Roesler

Kafka Streams’ Take on Watermarks and Triggers

John Roesler .

Back in May 2017, we laid out why we believe that Kafka Streams is better off without a concept of watermarks or triggers, and instead opts for a continuous refinement ...

Spring Cloud Stream Application
Soby Chacko

Spring for Apache Kafka Deep Dive – Part 2: Apache Kafka and Spring Cloud Stream

Soby Chacko .

On the heels of part 1 in this blog series, Spring for Apache Kafka – Part 1: Error Handling, Message Conversion and Transaction Support, here in part 2 we’ll focus ...

Serverless
Neil Avery

Journey to Event Driven – Part 3: The Affinity Between Events, Streams and Serverless

Neil Avery .

With serverless being all the rage, it brings with it a tidal change of innovation. Given that it is at a relatively early stage, developers are still trying to grok ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Try Confluent Platform

Download Now

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. Click here to learn more or change your cookie settings. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies.