Why Apache Kafka® Migration Costs Are Often Underestimated

As a critical, stateful system, migrating Apache Kafka® deployments is virtually always a complex engineering project where the most significant expenses are often hidden. 

Scoping and committing to a Kafka migration requires multiple layers of careful calculation involving infrastructure choices, data complexity, team expertise, and risk tolerance. Underestimating these variables leads to blown budgets and extended timelines. This guide breaks down the key cost drivers, provides strategies to mitigate them, and shows how to approach your migration for a predictable and successful outcome.

TL;DR: Migrating Apache Kafka can be more costly and complex than it first appears. Beyond infrastructure and licensing, the true cost of Kafka migration includes engineering hours, downtime risk, and dual-environment operations. This guide breaks down every major expense, compares self-managed vs. Confluent Cloud costs, and shows how to cut migration time and spend—up to 70% lower total cost of ownership (TCO)—using Cluster Linking and the Confluent Migration Accelerator Program.

Learn more about the system integrators that drive the Confluent Migration Accelerator or download the complete migration guide.

What Drives The Cost of an Apache Kafka® Migration?

Many teams just want a concise answer to what sounds like a straightforward question: “How much does it cost to migrate Kafka?” The reality is that a single number can’t tell you what it takes to get to that dollar amount: what are you compromising or risking by moving too fast and what mission-critical, revenue-driving projects could you be delaying by moving too slowly? 

While visible costs like infrastructure and licensing are easy to budget for, the true cost of a Kafka migration and the project's ultimate success are dictated by hidden factors: engineering hours spent on planning and scripting, the business impact of potential downtime, and the operational overhead of running two environments in parallel.

Essential Steps in Planning and Executing a Successful Kafka Migration

A successful migration requires a careful accounting of costs across several domains. The most expensive items are not on an invoice but are measured in your team's time and the risk to your business operations as you expand your infrastructure of your application.

• Infrastructure Rework & Provisioning: Whether moving from on-prem to the cloud, or from IaaS to a managed service, you're building a new home for your data. This involves provisioning new hardware or cloud resources, configuring networking (VPCs, peering, security groups), setting up new IAM roles, and ensuring parity with your existing production environment. This foundational work is time-consuming and error-prone. The hidden operational burdens of managing this new stack can be significant. For a detailed use case, see the Skai Cloud Migration Blog.

• Engineering Hours & Resource Allocation: This is almost always the largest hidden cost. Your senior engineers will be dedicated to planning, writing migration scripts (for producers, consumers, and connectors), extensive testing, and data validation. A typical migration can consume several person-months of your most valuable engineering talent, pulling them away from feature development.

• Downtime Risk & Rollback Strategy: A "stop-the-world" migration, where you halt producers and wait for consumers to catch up, introduces direct business costs from service unavailability. The alternative, a live migration, is far more complex. You must account for the cost of building and testing a robust rollback plan in case of failure. The financial impact of even a short production outage can easily dwarf all other migration expenses.

• Tooling, Observability, and Data Loss Protection: Your new environment needs its own monitoring, logging, and alerting stack. This means configuring Prometheus, Grafana, and log shippers, or paying for new SaaS observability tools. Furthermore, you need a strategy for backups and disaster recovery from day one, adding to the architectural complexity and cost.

Kafka Migration Cost Comparison

When comparing self-managed Kafka vs Confluent Cloud cost, it's crucial to look beyond the monthly infrastructure bill and factor in these substantial operational and engineering investments. (Download the Forrester report, Total Ecconomic Impact of Confluent Cloud, to learn more.)

How Can You Reduce Kafka Migration Expenses and Risks? 

Mitigating costs is about reducing complexity and risk. By leveraging the right tools and strategies, you can execute a smooth, predictable, and budget-friendly migration.

The most effective way to de-risk a migration and control costs is to eliminate the primary factors: downtime and manual effort.

Use Cluster Linking to Migrate With Zero Downtime: 

Cluster Linking in Confluent Cloud is the gold standard for modern Kafka migrations. It creates a byte-for-byte replica of your source topics on the destination cluster without needing a complex connector setup like MirrorMaker 2. This allows you to keep your source cluster running while you test and cut over consumers and producers application by application, at your own pace. This phased approach eliminates the need for a risky "big bang" cutover and avoids any service interruption. For a detailed walkthrough, see the documentation on migrating with Cluster Linking.

Using Cluster Linking for Data Replication Between Open Source Kafka and Confluent Cloud Clusters

Aggressively Reduce Project Scope

Before migrating, conduct a thorough audit of your existing Kafka usage.

• Identify and eliminate unused topics. Many clusters are cluttered with topics from old projects or experiments.

• Archive old data. Reduce the total volume of data you need to move by archiving non-essential topic data to object storage.

• Consolidate similar topics where possible to simplify the new architecture.

Plan and Test in a Parallel Environment 

Use Cluster Linking to create a parallel, fully-synced test environment in your target destination. This allows your teams to conduct comprehensive performance and functional testing against live, real-world data without impacting the production source cluster. This "test-in-production" capability is invaluable for identifying and fixing issues before the final cutover.

How Does the Confluent Solve Common Kafka Migration Challenges?

For organizations looking for expert guidance and proven methodologies, Confluent offers a dedicated program to streamline the process. The Confluent Migration Accelerator combines expert professional services with specialized tools to de-risk and speed up your move to a modern, cloud-native architecture.

The results are tangible: customers using the accelerator have been able to cut migration costs by up to 60%, reduce migration timelines by 50%, and get new streaming workloads in production up to 6 months faster. In partnership with system integrators that specialize, Confluent ensures you have hands-on assistance and expert guidance through every stage of the process from initial planning and architectural design to execution. 

By leveraging best practices honed across hundreds of successful enterprise migrations, the accelerator helps you avoid common pitfalls and ensures a smooth transition. The program also provides access to a rich ecosystem of partners and specialized tools to further streamline the migration process. This partnership ensures that your new architecture is not only technologically sound but also optimized for performance, scalability, and cost-efficiency.

A key component of this offering is Confluent Cloud, a fully managed, serverless data streaming platform powered by a Kora, the cloud-native Kafka engine. It eliminates the operational burden of managing Kafka, providing a serverless, elastic, and resilient platform powered by the Kora Engine.

The benefits of leveraging Confluent's expertise are tangible and backed by real-world results. Customers who have utilized the Confluent Migration Accelerator—like SAS, Big Commerce, and Cerved—have seen significant improvements in both cost and time-to-market. 

BigCommerce’s real-time analytics architecture processes 1.6 billion events per day—all migrated with zero downtime, zero data loss, and zero disruption to the business. Download the migration guide to learn more. Real-World Kafka Migration Costs & Savings: Customer Examples

The theoretical benefits of a managed migration translate into significant, real-world savings.

• Skai successfully migrated from self-managed Kafka on AWS EC2 to Confluent Cloud. By auditing and reducing their topic count by more than 90%—from over 90,000 to just 1,800—and leveraging the efficiency of a managed service, they were able to remove dozens of brokers from their compute footprint and signficantly reduce their maintenance costs and Kafka cloud budget .

• SecurityScorecard faced a ballooning operational burden managing their self-hosted Kafka. Migrating to Confluent Cloud allowed them to decommission their IaaS cluster and re-assign their platform engineering team away from Kafka maintenance to higher-value projects. This move is projected to save the company over $1 million in operational costs over three years. Watch the webinar + demo to learn more.

• Michelin cut its Kafka costs by 35% by migrating to Confluent Cloud. By no longer having to take on the complexity of managing and maintaining Kafka infrastructure in-house, their team was able to increase engineering velocity, accelerating Michelin’s “journey to becoming a data-first and digital business.”

These examples highlight how migrating to a managed service drastically reduces the total cost of ownership of self-managed Kafka. By the numbers:

• $1M+ saved by SecurityScorecard over three years in operational costs.

• 90% reduction in Skai's topic count after a pre-migration audit.

• Up to 60% cost reduction when using the Migration Accelerator Program.

• Zero expected downtime for migrations using Confluent Cluster Linking.

Comparing Key Cost Drivers for Self-Managed Kafka vs. Confluent Cloud

How to Estimate your Kafka Migration Cost

Migrating Kafka is a strategic move that, when done correctly, pays long-term dividends in reliability, scalability, and operational efficiency. The key is to look past the obvious infrastructure costs and plan for the hidden expenses of engineering time and downtime risk. By leveraging powerful tools like Cluster Linking and adopting a phased, test-driven approach, you can eliminate the primary sources of cost and risk.

Ready to plan your move? Get a clear, data-driven view of your potential costs and savings.

• Use our TCO Calculator to model your specific scenario and calculate your Kafka cost savings.

• Talk to an expert to get a personalized assessment of your migration needs. 

Kafka Migration FAQs

What affects Kafka migration cost the most?

The two biggest factors are engineering hours and downtime risk. A complex migration requiring significant custom scripting and a lengthy production outage will always be the most expensive. Tools that reduce manual effort and enable zero-downtime migration, like Cluster Linking, provide the highest cost savings.

How long does a Kafka migration take?

This varies widely based on complexity. A simple migration with a few applications could take a few weeks. A large, mission-critical deployment with hundreds of producers and consumers could take anywhere from three to nine months of planning, testing, and phased execution.

Can I migrate Kafka without downtime?

Yes. Modern migration tools like Confluent Cluster Linking are designed specifically for this purpose. By creating a real-time, byte-perfect replica of topics in your target cluster, you can migrate applications one by one without ever having to stop your source cluster, thus achieving a zero-downtime migration.

Apache®, Apache Kafka®, and the Kafka logo are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries. No endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation is implied by using these marks. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.