실시간 움직이는 데이터가 가져다 줄 가치, Data in Motion Tour에서 확인하세요!
Software projects of all sizes and complexities have a common challenge: building a scalable solution for search. Who has never seen an application use RDBMS SQL statements to run searches? You might be wondering, is this a good solution? As the databases professor at my university used to say, it depends.
Using SQL to run your search might be enough for your use case, but as your project requirements grow and more advanced features are needed—for example, enabling synonyms, multilingual search, or even machine learning—your relational database might not be enough.
Disclaimer: There are nice projects around like PostgreSQL full-text search that might be enough for your use case, and you should certainly consider them.
For this reason and others as well, many projects start using their database for everything, and over time they might move to a search engine like Elasticsearch or Solr.
Building a resilient and scalable solution is not always easy. It involves many moving parts, from data preparation to building indexing and query pipelines. Luckily, this task looks a lot like the way we tackle problems that arise when connecting data.
A common first step is using the application persistence layer to save the documents directly to the database as well as to the search engine. For small-scale projects, this technique lets the development team iterate quickly without having to scale the required infrastructure.
Figure 1. Direct indexing
While the intuitive approach, known as a distributed transaction, is popular and seems useful, you might encounter consistency problems if one of your writes fails. It also requires both systems to always be available, so no maintenance windows are possible.
If you are interested in knowing more, there is a great article by Martin Kleppmann et al. that describes the existing problems with heterogeneous, distributed transactions. Distributed transactions are very hard to implement successfully, which is why we’ll introduce a log-inspired system such as Apache Kafka®.
We will introduce three different approaches that use Apache Kafka® to help you build scalable and resilient solutions able to handle an increasing number or documents, integrate different sources of information, introduce ontologies and other machine learning approaches such as learning to rank, etc.
As soon as the number of data points involved in your search feature increases, typically we’ll introduce a broker in between all the involved components. This architectural pattern provides several benefits:
Usually, this would look something like the following:
Figure 2. Scaling indexing
A collection of agents are responsible for collecting data from the data sources (e.g., relational databases) and storing them in an intermediate broker. Later, another agent or group of agents will collect the data from the brokers and store them in our search engine.
This can be achieved using many different tools, but if you are already using Apache Kafka as your middleware/broker, Kafka Connect is a scalable framework well suited for connecting systems across Kafka. Kafka Connect has the great benefit of simplifying your deployment requirements, as it is bundled with Apache Kafka and its ecosystem.
In case Kafka Connect is new to you, before moving forward, I recommend checking out the Kafka Connect blog series where my colleague Robin Moffatt introduces Kafka Connect with a nice example.
If you visit the Confluent Hub, you’ll also find that there are many connectors, such as the Kafka Connect JDBC connector, Kafka Connect Elasticsearch connector, two Apache-2.0-licensed Solr community connectors, and others created by the community.
The JDBC and Elasticsearch connectors are included in the Confluent Platform, but if you’re using a different Apache Kafka distribution, you can install them by downloading the connectors from the Confluent Hub and following the documentation.
Moving data while adapting it to the requirements of your search product is a common integration point when building infrastructure like the one described in this blog post.
This is usually achieved by implementing some variation of the change data capture pattern, in which the JDBC connector comes into play. This connector can be used as a source (streaming changes from a database into Kafka) or as a sink (streaming data from a Kafka topic into a database). For this use case, we are going to use it as a source connector.
The JDBC connector has many powerful features, such as supporting a variety of JDBC data types, detecting
DELETE TABLE commands, varying polling intervals and, perhaps most notably, copying data incrementally.
The process of moving data works by periodically running SQL queries. To accomplish this, the JDBC connector tracks a set of columns that are used to determine which rows are new, which were updated, etc.
The JDBC connector supports several modes of operation:
More details on how to use the JDBC connector can be found in this deep dive post by my colleague Robin Moffatt.
The connector relies on the database JDBC driver(s) for its core functionality. The JDBC driver for your database of choice should be installed in the same
kafka-connect-jdbc directory as the connector. If you are using a Linux package such as DEB or RPM, this is usually in the
/usr/share/java/kafka-connect-jdbc directory. If you’re installing from an archive, this will be in the
share/java/kafka-connect-jdbc directory in your installation.
The following is an example configuration that sets up the connector to query the products table of a MySQL database, using the “modified” column for timestamps and “ID” column for primary keys, and writing records to the
db-products Kafka topics:
name=mysql-source connector.class=io.confluent.connect.jdbc.JdbcSourceConnector tasks.max=10
mode=timestamp+incrementing timestamp.column.name=modified incrementing.column.name=id
Schema evolution is inevitable in all data integration situations, and search is no exception. If the Avro converter is used, the connector will detect when a change on the incoming table schemas happened and manage the interaction with Confluent Schema Registry.
In all likelihood, the schema of your data will change over the life of your application, so using Schema Registry will make it easier for you to adjust and ensure data format consistency, as well as enable data production and consumption to evolve with mode independence.
A frequent question that comes up with the JDBC connector is selecting the right mode of operation. Although the connector allows you to start from operation modes perfectly suited for initial load bulk mode, it is very important to think, table by table, the best way to import each table’s records into Apache Kafka.
The connector allows you write a custom query to import data into Kafka. If you are planning to use this advanced mode, you should be careful and make sure the performance of your query matches your timing expectations.
Last but not least, remember this connector works by issuing regular SQL queries directly into your database. Always keep an eye on their performance and make sure they run in the expected time to allow your pipeline to function properly.
You can read more about options for integrating data from relational sources into Kafka in No More Silos: How to Integrate Your Databases with Apache Kafka and CDC.
After you getting your events stored into Apache Kafka, the next logical step for building your initial indexing pipeline is to pull the data from Kafka into Elasticsearch. To do that, you can use the Kafka Connect Elasticsearch connector.
The Kafka Connect Elasticsearch connector has a rich set of features, such as mapping inference and schema evolution. You can find the specific configuration details in the documentation.
For an easy way to get started with the Elasticsearch connector, use this configuration:
name=search-indexing-sink connector.class=io.confluent.connect.elasticsearch.ElasticsearchSinkConnector tasks.max=1 topics=db-products key.ignore=true connection.url=http://localhost:9200 type.name=products
The configuration will pull from a topic name called
db-products, created earlier with the JDBC connector. Using a maximum of one task (you can configure more tasks if needed), it will pull the data stored in that topic into a
db-products index at an Elasticsearch instance located at
The Elasticsearch connector is generally straightforward, but there are a few considerations to take note of.
As you might already know, Elasticsearch mappings can be challenging to get right. You need to think carefully about how your data looks for each of the use cases involved because even with dynamic fields, the end result of your queries will depend on how you have configured your analyzers and tokenizers.
The Elasticsearch connector allows you, to a certain degree, to use automatic mapping inference. However, if you are building your search infrastructure, an even better way is to define an index template where you can control exactly how your data is going to be processed internally.
Another issue you might encounter is around retries, which could happen for various reasons (e.g., Elasticsearch is busy or down for maintenance). In such a scenario, the connector will continue to run and retry the unsuccessful operations using an exponential backoff, giving Elasticsearch time to recover.
As you can see, it’s easy to use Apache Kafka and Kafka Connect to scale your search infrastructure by connecting different source applications, databases, and your search engine.
This solution uses a single technology stack to create one uniform approach that helps your project integrate different sources and build scalable and resilient search. It is a natural evolution from the initial application-centric setup.
If you’d like to know more, you can download the Confluent Platform, the leading distribution of Apache Kafka.
Companies are looking to optimize cloud and tech spend, and being incredibly thoughtful about which priorities get assigned precious engineering and operations resources. “Build vs. Buy” is being taken seriously again. And if we’re honest, this probably makes sense. There is a lot to optimize.
Operating Kafka at scale can consume your cloud spend and engineering time. And operating everyday tasks like scaling or deploying new clusters can be complex and require dedicated engineers. This post focuses on how Confluent Cloud is 1) Resource Efficient, 2) Fully Managed, and 3) Complete.